CO129-295 - Public Offices - 1899 — Page 740

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next

736

DOMESTIC.

C.O.

HONG KONG

No. 22855

22835

RECO

REG 28 AUG 39

1899

Aug

(Subject.)

Criminal Lunatic 6. Bithrey

perrions Paper. fecunctonces hardly appear to justify

You

20818

Copy

29 Sep 255or

10-1961-18000 1

ubsequunt Paper.

$35.

removal, but if left. attached unfortunate to matter will arrange for this

Mr. Lucas

(Minutes.)

Unless

ive

real

telegraphy,

It is not likely that he will

reach here before the end of

November. I would simply send copy to far and say that Mrs. Chamberlain does not gather that the necessity of removal is sufficiently urgent to justify any further delay in

the matter. And send com duch 1540

A.F281/8

Yes. I think that under the ini

Home

Edit History

2026-05-31 13:31:30 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

736 DOMESTIC. C.O. HONG KONG No. 22855 22835 RECO REG 28 AUG 39 1899 Aug (Subject.) Criminal Lunatic 6. Bithrey perrions Paper. fecunctonces hardly appear to justify You 20818 Copy 29 Sep 255or 10-1961-18000 1 ubsequunt Paper. $35. removal, but if left. attached unfortunate to matter will arrange for this Mr. Lucas (Minutes.) Unless ive real telegraphy, It is not likely that he will an reach here before the end of November. I would simply send copy to far and say that Mrs. Chamberlain does not gather that the necessity of removal is sufficiently urgent to justify any further delay in the matter. And send com duch 1540 A.F281/8 Yes. I think that under the ini Home

Baseline (Original)

736 DOMESTIC. C.O. HONG KONG No. 22855 22835 RECO REG 28 AUG 39 1899 Aug (Subject.) Criminal Lunatic 6. Bithrey perrions Paper. fecunctonces hardly appear to justify You 20818 Copy 29 Sep 255or 10-1961-18000 1 ubsequunt Paper. $35. removal, but if loft. attecher unfortaure to matter will arrance for this Mr. Lucas (Minutes.) Unless ive real tekgraphy, It is not likely that he will an reach here before theend of November. I would simfl send copy to far and say that ells. Chamberlain does not sather that the necessity of removal is suffimity ingent to justify any further rühren the matter. And send com duch 1540 A.F281/8 Yes. I think that under the ini Home

2026-05-31 13:31:30 · Baseline

View content

736